From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 30 22:15:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AF81065674; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:15:49 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308582EA036C6@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308582EA036C6@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200906301815.51568.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Moore, Robert" Subject: Re: 20090625 regression in AcpiGetDevices X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:16:00 -0000 On Tuesday 30 June 2009 05:21 pm, Moore, Robert wrote: > We've just discovered a regression in 20090625 that seriously > affects the AcpiGetDevices interface. The _HID and _CID strings are > no longer matched properly and will confuse any bus-scanning code > that uses the interface. > > The ACPICA bugzilla is below, it contains a patch for the problem. I don't think we use the function any where but I just updated my patchset with the fix. > Apologies for any inconvenience. Thanks for letting us know! Jung-uk Kim