From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 14 16:08:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF83E106566C; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es) Received: from proxypop2.sarenet.es (proxypop2.sarenet.es [194.30.0.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F258FC13; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.1.204] (izaro.sarenet.es [192.148.167.11]) by proxypop2.sarenet.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344487351D; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:08:37 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Borja Marcos In-Reply-To: <20091214154750.GF1666@garage.freebsd.pl> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:08:36 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <495F94EF-8F57-440D-8810-F40E40DE69D5@sarenet.es> References: <20091029205121.GB3418@garage.freebsd.pl> <9AA2C968-F09D-473D-BD13-F13B3F94ED60@sarenet.es> <20091214154750.GF1666@garage.freebsd.pl> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Martin Matuska , Ronald Klop Subject: Re: zfs receive gives: internal error: Argument list too long X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:08:38 -0000 On Dec 14, 2009, at 4:47 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:08:54PM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote: >>=20 >> On Oct 29, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >>=20 >> It's caused a panic for me on 8.0-RC2/amd64. Seems a new problem, =20 >> never saw a panic in this situation before. >>=20 >> How to reproduce: With /usr/src and /usr/obj in a dataset, just >>=20 >> cd /usr/src >> make clean >>=20 >> Instant panic, in less than 20 seconds. >>=20 >> Trying to get panic information, unfortunately I'm running on VMWare =20= >> Fussion and the silly thing doesn't offer the equivalent of a serial =20= >> console. >=20 > Martin, this is the panic report I was refering to. Could you please = try > to reproduce it? Maybe first with my patch to confirm it is = reproducible > and then with your patch to confirm it has no such problem? > I'd be very grateful if you could do that. I don't want something to = go > into the tree if there might be a problem with the patch. It was me, not Martin :) I will try to reproduce again. By the way, any news about the zfs = receive deadlock when accessing the target dataset? Borja.