Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:11:28 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Jonathan Price <freebsd@jonathanprice.org> Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer" Message-ID: <E2CB321B-0E7B-4734-AEFE-93DD8BDB711E@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <53FE29A8.1000909@jonathanprice.org> References: <88a42e1006e3fac7508a9419e342f1b2@mail.jonathanprice.org> <2173103.SJdXL7NPLT@overcee.wemm.org> <53FD7B34.1050408@jonathanprice.org> <CAN6yY1uxft_3cTkWV8NTnOai-928DnS3uW-XyD3BwcCvjBKeQw@mail.gmail.com> <2c1d74944371a4be730ff1b666489467@mail.jonathanprice.org> <CAN6yY1vU_aQKhhoKXGPSRQJSPSvz-mqeh3GFkkCg50irbpk-3A@mail.gmail.com> <53FE29A8.1000909@jonathanprice.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 Aug 2014, at 18:55 , Jonathan Price <freebsd@jonathanprice.org> = wrote: > Would that mean that a line such as 'ifconfig_IF=3D"DHCP"' would not = count the interface as being explicitly configured? I haven=92t looked = into SLAAC or DHCPv6 configuration yet, so I'm not sure if either of = those require a line like the one above. Not for v6. That only does v4. I am doing: ifconfig_IF_ipv6=3D=93up" or ifconfig_IF_ipv6=3D=93inet6 accept_rtadv=94 depending on what I want to accomplish. The former is largly for = systems where I configure more than one address manually and then I tend = to put them all in _aliasN lines to avoid confusion (and I do the same = with v4 basically); the latter is for SLAAC. /bz =97=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb "Come on. Learn, goddamn it.", WarGames, 1983
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E2CB321B-0E7B-4734-AEFE-93DD8BDB711E>