Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 03:48:54 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include string.h strings.h Message-ID: <20020406034854.C58485@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <20020406084728.GA65304@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 11:47:28AM %2B0300 References: <200204040541.g345fva08087@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020406084728.GA65304@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:41:57PM -0800, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > mike 2002/04/03 21:41:57 PST > > > > Modified files: > > include string.h strings.h > > Log: > > o Move some function prototypes from <string.h> to the newly rewritten > > <strings.h>, based on POSIX.1-2001's requirements. > > o Add 'restrict' qualifier (spelled '__restrict') to functions in > > <string.h>, as per C99 and POSIX.1-2001. > > o Properly expose new POSIX.1-2001 functions in <string.h>. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.13 +24 -22 src/include/string.h > > 1.2 +28 -13 src/include/strings.h > > > You forgot to fix the relevant manpages. I didn't really forget. In BSD, <string.h> is a valid include to make visible all objects from <strings.h>. I'm not sure I want to change the BSD policy to match POSIX, when we can easily support both. OTOH, I have no objections to someone else making the changes to the relevant manuals. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020406034854.C58485>