From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 26 20:57:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B96116A4CE for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:57:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086EC43D3F for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:57:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jsimola@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so163698wri for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:57:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OtSVaAinaPYU77lPFbYKgSQC+inxWh9bvtKD9Htkls5LyjiF0s25Q9uazvascl+M1E493b/rjyLPHx4KtO9n50v9u6UP+FQOjPjYkwVa2/EHfHGtRD3JuFvRxFyfOcphK3pcP7gn9pZnzUMNIcnPELCpC2wpFUOt7wKcZG7pXKw= Received: by 10.54.29.22 with SMTP id c22mr301674wrc; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:57:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.39.34 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:57:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8eea04080501261257583771cf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:57:41 -0800 From: Jon Simola To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: em(4) VLAN + PROMISC followup question X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jon@abccomm.com List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:57:45 -0000 Referencing: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2004-November/005738.html I appear to have hit a similar or the same problem (with the exception that I'm not bridging with the vlan), has anyone (Robert Watson appears to be the lead) come up with anything? My config is 5.3-STABLE with em1 the parent for a handful of vlans. em1: flags=18843 mtu 1500 options=5b inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe72:f30b%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 ether 00:30:48:72:f3:0b media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) status: active vlan120: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet xxx.xx.177.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 209.53.177.255 inet6 fe80::205:5dff:fe71:8d20%vlan120 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd ether 00:30:48:72:f3:0b media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) status: active vlan: 120 parent interface: em1 Running a tcpdump on either em1 or one of the vlan interfaces reduces throughput by a factor of 10 or so. Running tcpdump with the -p option does not. This is a steady stream of 10 to 20 Mbps of traffic, routing 11 /24s over 4 vlans, kernel polling is enabled for the em devices. Thank you, Jon Simola Systems Administrator ABC Communications