Date: Wed, 1 Nov 1995 11:45:05 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: vince@apollo.COSC.GOV, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, jc@irbs.com, current@FreeBSD.org, FAQ@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1 update Message-ID: <199511011945.LAA23144@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <862.815252584@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Nov 1, 95 11:03:04 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > So what you are saying is that -release is really just -current > > at some point? and -stable is just really -current before a -release? > > NO. NO? I think he has it right eventhough he says it a bit oddly.. -current always moves forwards. every so often a 'branch' is made that is eventually made into a release.. What I'm not sure of myself, is whether -stable derives from -current, or from a previous (unstable?) release. (because we are effectively doing both at the moment) > > Jordan >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511011945.LAA23144>