From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 14 10:07:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F01F16A41C for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:07:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@ion.lu) Received: from linion.ion.lu (linion.ion.lu [80.90.47.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F8143D4C for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:07:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@ion.lu) Received: (qmail 66194 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jul 2005 12:07:55 +0200 Received: from vodsl-1739.vo.lu (HELO ?192.168.0.27?) (steve@ion.lu@80.90.38.203) by linion.ion.lu with SMTP; 14 Jul 2005 12:07:55 +0200 Message-ID: <42D6397E.7040802@ion.lu> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:07:58 +0200 From: Steve Clement Organization: ION Network Solutions User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edwin Groothuis References: <42CB0982.1000102@ion.lu> <20050706013817.GA1186@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20050706013817.GA1186@k7.mavetju> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0575ADD0133D0CCC8AA73381" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Patch Levels in Ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:07:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0575ADD0133D0CCC8AA73381 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Edwin Groothuis wrote: >On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:28:18AM +0200, Steve Clement wrote: > > >>I have a port with 2 FLAGS: >> >>BLA_ENABLE=yes >>BLA2_ENABLE=yes >> >>now I need to apply different patches depending on what options are set. >> >>patch-aa patch-ab are flailing so what's the correct procedure: >> >>split the patch-* to be applied correctly into EXTRA_PATCHES >> >>or is there a more elegant way? >> >> > >I have had something similar. I just renamed all patches to patch5- >and patch4- (yes, indeed for 4.x and 5.x) and added them to >EXTRA_PATCHES depending on the OS version. > > Ok, that seems to be the way to go BUT, what is applied first: EXTRA_PATCHES patch-aa patch-ab and so on... ? Because now it fails my EXTRA_PATCH, can I apply EXTRA_PATCHES - AFTER - patch-aa , patch-ab ... ? Thanks a lot, Once this is cleared out I am more than happy to update the porters handbook... cheers, Steve C -- ION Network Solutions Steve Clement Unix System Administrator 209, rue des Romains L-8041 Bertrange Tel: +352 261 276-2 Fax: +352 261 276-9 mailto:steve@ion.lu http://www.ion.lu --------------enig0575ADD0133D0CCC8AA73381 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC1jl+MH8DIBsiCrgRA/nlAJ9NSkjz4uQvRxCAVUKJeKFoaOzUcQCgoeTp BiWiBX5Pdz93GbAUpmw+iv8= =xGUX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0575ADD0133D0CCC8AA73381--