From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 08:10:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1365716A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:10:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.113.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305B643D48 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id 5BD4F119CC; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:10:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:10:34 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Chris Message-ID: <20050403081034.GA870@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <3aaaa3a0503271958205ca8e1@mail.gmail.com> <20050403014218.GA57319@intserv.int1.b.intern> <3aaaa3a050402233952162788@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a050402233952162788@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd naming of releases X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:10:38 -0000 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005.04.03 08:39:43 +0100, Chris wrote: > Well you cannot change how people think and act, rather then changing > the way thousands of people think I think its better to change how the > naming is done on non stable releases, what happened with 5.x was that > it was named to get more people to use and as such more testing but > they were fooled into thinking it was based on stable code and so we "fooled into"??? I think the release announcements pretty clearly stated what the releases were. Of cause if people can't be bothered to read that, then there is not really much else to do. > seen mass datacentres and individual users using 5.1 and 5.2 for > production use, then when 5.3 did the library version bump lots of > issues arose from it because so many people were using 5.1 and 5.2. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCT6T6h9pcDSc1mlERAm8ZAJ4t3TRulRIULGbVllzHVHrbvj3iGgCgqg4g BGBNTgvFnNVRVZASgt7xenE= =Wn4F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--