From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 03:53:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228BD1065675; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.delphij.net (delphij-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:2c9::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2B48FC1F; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [211.166.10.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F9B528449; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:53:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (tarsier.geekcn.org [211.166.10.233]) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D55EC5F63; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:53:02 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geekcn.org Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org ([211.166.10.233]) by localhost (mail.geekcn.org [211.166.10.233]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bT41jMwvSqdc; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:52:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from charlie.delphij.net (adsl-76-237-33-62.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [76.237.33.62]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F0A9EC5F5F; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:52:53 +0800 (CST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent: mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to: x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jVxk19pNjLjcDfshSQWw3PmkO06J0h5V08vEzUcGntyu4tuXSIwc6t6HMDy/c1dsY lf8R//pJSAlJX3GHGd2oQ== Message-ID: <49924B92.6050307@delphij.net> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:52:50 -0800 From: Xin LI Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090202) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lawrence Stewart References: <499244E6.9030205@delphij.net> <499246D4.8020908@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <499246D4.8020908@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=18EDEBA0; url=http://www.delphij.net/delphij.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current , d@delphij.net Subject: Re: [RFC] Skeleton jail (rc.d feature proposal) X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:53:05 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lawrence Stewart wrote: > Xin LI wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi, >> >> Ok, some local users has prodded me in committing the "skeleton jail" > > [snip] > > Can you describe how this differs from the functionality provided by the > ezjail port? (/usr/ports/sysutils/ezjail/) I think they have different targets. Skeleton jail is more lightweight which is only very few lines of changes to the base system (i.e. the aim is to provide convenient shortcut for common tasks, not to be a complete solution); the functionality provided by skeleton jail, on the other hand, could be useful building blocks to ezjail. Cheers, - -- Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmSS5EACgkQi+vbBBjt66D4NQCfSL6g+UgptFPEAnea7HBjDZU4 /30AnAkF7eJU1/v6gD+irFrdO/aaLZvS =spnz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----