Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:42:40 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: building m4 in poudriere cross-build Message-ID: <ac20a2a3-9a89-1551-f2d4-b7aaa24348fa@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <1481755164.1889.430.camel@freebsd.org> References: <CALd%2Bdcere=CVXCAp=Aa98gEK%2BUyzQAFq_ke%2BcokgLbv=WGO2vA@mail.gmail.com> <706A6D47-21F3-4017-8CD4-C651F37900E6@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <1481752684.1889.425.camel@freebsd.org> <144A0FFB-730E-42C4-8FE6-7387505145A0@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <1481755164.1889.430.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi All, 15.12.2016 01:39, Ian Lepore пишет: > There are many ports that fail to compile on arm that need only a tiny > change to start working (for either native or cross-compile). It > doesn't take long to figure out the fixes, but it's virtually > impossible to get the fixes committed. Do you have any evidence of such resistance (may be PR)? > The ports maintainers often > don't know anything about arm or other platforms and are reluctant to > commit changes they don't understand and can't test. Then committers should teach maintainers to deal with ARM specifics. Me for one would be glad to get more info how to fix ARM & ports problems. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ac20a2a3-9a89-1551-f2d4-b7aaa24348fa>