From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Dec 11 1:46:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061F537B419; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 01:46:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fBB9kQa79412; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 02:46:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBB9kMM26143; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 02:46:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200112110946.fBB9kMM26143@harmony.village.org> To: Greg Lehey Subject: Re: Getting rid of /usr file system (was: Using a larger block size on large filesystems) Cc: Terry Lambert , Nik Clayton , Mike Smith , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Marko Zec , "Louis A. Mamakos" , Matthew Dillon , Sheldon Hearn , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:44:58 +1030." <20011210124458.B63585@monorchid.lemis.com> References: <20011210124458.B63585@monorchid.lemis.com> <20011208102658.B11428@dragon.nuxi.com> <200112082050.fB8Ko1T01347@mass.dis.org> <20011209164606.C83634@monorchid.lemis.com> <20011209104437.A69671@clan.nothing-going-on.org> <3C141A26.9D8BC688@mindspring.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 02:46:22 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20011210124458.B63585@monorchid.lemis.com> Greg Lehey writes: : Well, I'm not forgetting this, I didn't know it. But it seems to make : sense. This was one of the things I mentioned earlier. I have had systems that have separate / and /usr, and others that have one big /. I don't mind so much that / and /usr are on the same partition by default, but I don't want to see us go to one big '/'. That does cause more problems than it solves (and makes it impossible to do fastish boots by kicking the fsck into the back ground). However, I've had occasion to have systems where / and /usr need to be separate partitions, so as long as we don't require them to be on the same partition, I'd say go for it. I suspect, however, that we'll find that crash recovery really is a big factor since /usr does get written to on every man command that generates a new man page... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message