From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 13 19:39:26 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 858C316A4CE; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:39:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BC57243D2F; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:39:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9DJd5CJ047722;
	Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:39:05 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:39:06 EDT."
             <200410131239.06555.jhb@FreeBSD.org> 
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:39:05 +0200
Message-ID: <47721.1097696345@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/sab sab.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:39:26 -0000

In message <200410131239.06555.jhb@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin writes:
>> > >   Modified files:
>> > >     sys/dev/sab          sab.c
>> > >   Log:
>> > >
>> > >   Isn't this driver superseeded by uart(4) anyway ?
>> >
>> > Yes, in principle. I don't think I'm in the position to remove sab(4)
>> > though.
>>
>> Uart(4) works fine as a replacement for sab(4) but we're not ready to
>> switch to uart(4) by default on sparc64.
>
>I can't get any kernel besides GENERIC to boot on my ultra60 atm, and GENERIC 
>uses sab rather than uart.

I tried both ofw_console, sab and uart on my ultra60 and they all
worked.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.