From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 9 18:18:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A6A1065673 for ; Sat, 9 May 2009 18:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:613:100::211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B250C8FC18 for ; Sat, 9 May 2009 18:18:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C3BB71CDE9; Sat, 9 May 2009 20:18:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:18:42 +0200 From: Ed Schouten To: Lothar Scholz Message-ID: <20090509181842.GB58540@hoeg.nl> References: <976698487.20090509182307@scriptolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pCBpnpYZ3zWUlzNh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <976698487.20090509182307@scriptolutions.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: FreeBSD Arch Subject: Re: Are named posix semaphores not implemented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 18:18:44 -0000 --pCBpnpYZ3zWUlzNh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Lothar Scholz wrote: > raises a "bad system call 12" signal =46rom sem(4): options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --pCBpnpYZ3zWUlzNh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkoFyQIACgkQ52SDGA2eCwUZIACfRSgUPeF3/cpa/sFIUn457esn 52cAnRFJwrpu5VRKERSknVOXDv9zvLEt =YLNG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pCBpnpYZ3zWUlzNh--