Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:57:43 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Josh Carroll <josh.carroll@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: recent MFC of soreceive_dgram breaks kernels without INET6 option Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0809162056430.64176@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <8cb6106e0809160941m57b9aa9ehc21b5f92a396082b@mail.gmail.com> References: <8cb6106e0809160941m57b9aa9ehc21b5f92a396082b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Josh Carroll wrote: > I just csup'd this morning and now I cannot build a kernel that does not > include INET6. I can send my KERNCONF, but it is sufficient to create a > kernel config with: > > include GENERIC nooption INET6 > > Here's the error during kernel compilation of a kernel config without > "options INET6" in the kernel config: > > /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c: In function 'udp_inpcb_init': > /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:170: error: 'udp6_usrreqs' > undeclared (first use in this function) > /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:170: error: (Each undeclared > identifier is reported only once > /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:170: error: for each function it appears in.) > > It looks like the MFC for the new soreceive_dgram stuff is the culprit. > > Can this can be fixed to not require IPv6? I have no desire to include it in > my kernel, but if that will be the requirement going forward, perhaps a note > in UPDATING is in order? This was an oversight on my part -- none of our LINT build targets (apparently) excludes INET6. It's fixed easily with an ifdef, and I've received re@ approval to merge the fix, so it's in the tree as of about an hour or two ago. If you experience continuing problems after a cvsup, please let me know. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.1.10.0809162056430.64176>