From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 31 17:48:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F3316A41F for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 17:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1B913C480 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 17:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m33so328272wag for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:48:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Otmp8nBtORQuHOZmSr2pNIxkMuydmM4+XUl+L8GI7p7TNWzrYluouyFHtkZBr9v05UOJgoTgvhNgzyUZ4yv9b5fg6LmpbmjtNt2pUmQ54J3kp/wi8rq1o9PBw14bPe/YCV6uBmjj6fmYaEDFQp53R+wEfSczDuSHXNqNg5HdGR4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QhPzDC2Itrzy9c9AJVNr2+GRFYkKZJfTto1RwBnuIlPH236le1jchOm3IycoRXPIqyCg1vOD/KAhOOpV3xT9wer9chr3fI1KPY9Oxoifzj0223zyiMsDsAlWfLWsKbAWBGQbVZH/4S97VVlFlcz7APJ2BRQxUwXCYm27iIMUhOw= Received: by 10.114.154.1 with SMTP id b1mr895918wae.1180633727392; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.126.10 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2a41acea0705311048o7b4bd3cai3d381b4f9cf9b16c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:48:47 -0700 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Stefan Lambrev" In-Reply-To: <465E889E.9050008@sun-fish.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <462E3B4A.5030307@sun-fish.com> <46595504.4060803@sun-fish.com> <2a41acea0705271034s79d6774dg2008a057831d9de2@mail.gmail.com> <4659C59C.9030208@sun-fish.com> <2a41acea0705271220w2239211bn1c582031607ca1eb@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0705291506w156ac4d8s88c0fdd1025e5141@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0705301142v68505a1cs674008165095a335@mail.gmail.com> <465E889E.9050008@sun-fish.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:48:48 -0000 On 5/31/07, Stefan Lambrev wrote: > Thank you very much for the help Jack :)) > Unfortunately I'm off next four days and probably will not be able to > test it before Monday. > Btw any chances to have patch for releng_6 or the difference in the > drivers is too big ? :) Welcome, turns out its just as well that you didnt test yet because my test engineer came back to me this morning and it turns out there was still a code path that caused the autoneg back down to 100, I worked with him this morning and now I've simplified the code and plugged that hole at the same time, so another delta will be coming today. As for 6.X, well, its definitely a fix that needs to go back, but the question is how. What I would like to do is MFC the whole new shared code driver, in fact the next release that gets published by Intel which is a few months out should have that version anyway so I'll work that and the MFC together. However, if you have an urgent need for this fix on 6.2 I can make up a special patch, I'm pretty sure the old shared code still has what we need to do this. Jack