From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 2 16:35:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp-b.cbn.net.id (smtp-b.cbn.net.id [202.158.3.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B96637B4CF for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 16:35:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 93580 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2000 07:36:37 +0700 Received: from unknown (HELO mona.viper.com) (202.158.29.167) by smtp-b.cbn.net.id with SMTP; 3 Nov 2000 07:36:37 +0700 Received: (qmail 4410 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2000 00:31:24 -0000 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 07:31:24 +0700 From: John Indra To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Transparent wterm in enlightenment Message-ID: <20001103073124.A4378@indocyber.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3A20E42F@webmail.ksu.edu> <20001102220440.A2826@indocyber.com> <20001102190109.A31962@linux.rainbow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20001102190109.A31962@linux.rainbow>; from igor@raduga.dyndns.org on Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 07:01:09PM +0300 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.2.5i on Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 07:01:09PM +0300, Igor Roboul wrote: |wterm is not WM dependent, but who knows :-) ? wterm is definitely not WM dependent at all, BUT the pseudo-tansparency mode of any *term usually IS WM dependent or at least works the best with suitable WM. Regards, John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message