From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 07:11:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B04F16A4B3 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway.nixsys.be (gateway.nixsys.be [195.144.77.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACA843FDF for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:11:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from philip@nixsys.be) Received: from hermes.nixsys.be (hermes.nixsys.be [195.144.77.45]) by gateway.nixsys.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF891C159 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:11:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hermes.nixsys.be (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 30D176E; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:11:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:11:26 +0200 From: Philip Paeps To: security@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030917141126.GG656@hermes.nixsys.be> Mail-Followup-To: security@freebsd.org References: <200309161817.h8GIH1GL072348@freefall.freebsd.org> <5.0.2.1.1.20030916225106.02e09dc0@popserver.sfu.ca> <1063807011.15698.3.camel@gentoo1.enic.cc> <20030917140107.GD91843@madman.celabo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030917140107.GD91843@madman.celabo.org> X-Date-in-Rome: ante diem XV Kalendas Octobres MMDCCLVI ab Urbe Condida X-PGP-Fingerprint: FA74 3C27 91A6 79D5 F6D3 FC53 BF4B D0E6 049D B879 X-Message-Flag: Get a proper mailclient! Mutt: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:12.openssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:11:29 -0000 On 2003-09-17 09:01:07 (-0500), Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 06:56:51AM -0700, Mark Foster wrote: > > Also, the command as shown doesn't work under csh, you must run under sh > > Good point. I've always assumed use of the real shell :-) for security > advisories, but that is not a good assumption, particularly since by default > the root user has csh. It might be a good idea just to stick 'sh' in front of the command then, in which case it should work even if a local setup has some odd shell for root? - Philip -- Philip Paeps Please don't CC me, I am subscribed to the list. There is no such thing as a "dirty capitalist", only a capitalist.