From owner-freebsd-security Thu Mar 6 10:11:28 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278B637B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:11:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C8343F85 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:11:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA16592; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:10:25 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030306110849.026a8a60@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 11:10:21 -0700 To: Giorgos Keramidas From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Does the patching procedure work? Cc: Igor Roshchin , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20030306032045.GB1008@gothmog.gr> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030305101206.04858990@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030305052142.03f04200@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030305101206.04858990@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 08:20 PM 3/5/2003, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >The patches have to be applied in a different directory, namely in >/usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src, with `patch -p1' instead of `patch -p0' >one directory above that [Snip] >The only patch that applies in /usr/src/contrib/sendmail with `patch -p0' >instead of /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src is: > >= patch for sendmail 8.9 Gack. Why do people feel such a strong urge to mess with other folks' directory hierarchies? It makes maintenance a nightmare. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message