Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 11:43:05 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Cc: Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r500480 - in head: Mk databases databases/rubygem-dbm databases/rubygem-dbm/files lang/ruby24 lang/ruby25 Message-ID: <ygepnp1y3t2.wl-ume@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAP7rwciDnLGXyg4UH9YX8Hk3QHNNzgbgOLtpiErLoVVaXEwiHw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201904301122.x3UBMwPN080847@repo.freebsd.org> <yger29iyg7q.wl-ume@FreeBSD.org> <CAP7rwciDnLGXyg4UH9YX8Hk3QHNNzgbgOLtpiErLoVVaXEwiHw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, >>>>> On Wed, 1 May 2019 06:20:15 -0600 >>>>> Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> said: adamw> Is "LIBC" the option I'd pick to get Berkeley DB 1.x support? I'm adamw> entirely unclear on that after reading this patch. Yes, LIBC option is to use Berkeley DB in libc. When LIBC option is set, it checks if libc has dbm_open(). I confirmed that rubygem-dbm built with LIBC option could read the database created by dbm library shipped with previous Ruby. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO ume@mahoroba.org ume@FreeBSD.org http://www.mahoroba.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygepnp1y3t2.wl-ume>