Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:38:41 -0300 From: "Ass.Tec. Matik" <asstec@matik.com.br> To: "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Evgenii Davidov <dado@korolev-net.ru> Subject: Re: ipfw error in last stable version freebsd 8 Message-ID: <2bfaa9bf09c09060152fe7fe88474404.squirrel@wm.matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20100331170221.GB55010@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <4BB24C86.3030709@hardonline.com.br> <20100331020943.GA47928@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20100331164302.GA55699@korolev-net.ru> <20100331170221.GB55010@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:43:02PM +0400, Evgenii Davidov wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear Luigi, what is the meaning of this messages:
>>
>> Mar 31 00:33:04 i1 kernel: ip_dn_ctl dummynet: compat option 60
>> Mar 31 00:33:04 i1 kernel: ip_dummynet_compat setting compatibility with
>> FreeBSD 8
>
> it means that you are probably using a new kernel and an old /sbin/ipfw.
> The new ipfw/dummynet has a different kernel/userland API to accommodate
> some new features, and the kernel has a compatibility layer to translate
> requests back and forth between the two APIs.
>
so probably ... and what are the other probabilities ?
and this after today's cvsup?
unrecognized action 0 len 0 ** unrecognized action 0 len 0 ** unrecognized
action 0 0
** unrecognized action 0 len 0 ** unrecognized action 0 len 0 ** unrecognized
action 0 le
** unrecognized action 0 len 0 ** unrecognized action 0 len 0 ** unrecognized
action 0 len
unrecognized action 0 len 0 ** unrecognized action 0 len 0 ** unrecognized
action 0 len 0
nrecognized action 0 len 0 ** unrecognized action 0 len 0 ** unrecognized
action 0 len 0 **
ecognized action 0 len 0 **
with same ruleset from yesterday which works just fine ...
Joćo Martins
Eng.Resp.Helpdesk e Suporte Matik
https://suporte.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2bfaa9bf09c09060152fe7fe88474404.squirrel>