From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Dec  4 22:17:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.3/8.7.3) id WAA17150
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:17:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA17140
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:17:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA06094; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:17:16 -0800 (PST)
To: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
cc: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert),
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: news/lib - lib/news ??? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Dec 1996 20:59:55 PST."
             <199612050459.UAA01798@precipice.shockwave.com> 
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 1996 22:17:16 -0800
Message-ID: <6091.849766636@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I'm strongly against this change, and as the inn-current maintainer refuse
> to make it (and won't let it go in).

Then that sounds like a compelling argument to me.  The ports
collection was never intended as a mechanism for taking over
something from the maintainer, merely as an adjunct, and the
fundamental goal behind every patches directory is to someday
see it go away. :-)

					Jordan