Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 08:35:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256393] Issue with recreation of ppp/tun interfaces Message-ID: <bug-256393-7501-WGs482HUMe@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-256393-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-256393-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256393 --- Comment #23 from Eugene Grosbein <eugen@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #21) > Suggest? No, my words are stronger than that. The KERNEL should NOT impl= ement ANY routing policies. A loopback route IS a routing policy. I'm not sure I understand what "routing policies" mean in general. Nevertheless, I'd like we have some knob (sysctl?) to optionally preserve current behaviour when kernel assigns loopback routes, so packet filters st= ill deal with local traffic as going through loopback interface, BPF "sees" it = on lo0 too etc. Too many things will break if we just remove loopback routes unconditionall= y. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-256393-7501-WGs482HUMe>