From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Nov 1 14:09:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA10712 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 14:09:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp) Received: from game.over.net (game.over.net [193.189.162.107]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA10707 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 14:09:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tomaz.borstnar@over.net) Received: from [193.189.183.10] ([193.189.183.10] HELO hang ident: NO-IDENT-SERVICE [port 12038]) by mail.over.net with SMTP id <53829-168>; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 23:09:08 +0100 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19971101221516.00d177b0@haktar.siol.net> X-Sender: tomaz@haktar.siol.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sat, 01 Nov 1997 22:15:16 +0100 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: Tomaz Borstnar Subject: DNS setup: multiple IP numbers under single name in NS record? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello! Is something like this problematic: dom.ain IN NS multi-ip-name-of-host dom.ain IN NS some.remote.secondary where multi-ip-name-of-host has 2 IP addresses... Could this break anything? Tomaz ---- Tomaz Borstnar