From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jun 27 9:20: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E554737C0EE for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:20:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA74681; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:19:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA46753; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:18:03 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200006271618.KAA46753@harmony.village.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: ftp -o xxx Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "27 Jun 2000 12:46:19 +0200." References: <200006260434.WAA16059@harmony.village.org> <200006261614.KAA19406@harmony.village.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:18:02 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: : Warner Losh writes: : > In message Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: : > : Wouldn't it be better to add socks support to fetch(1)? : > It would be better, maybe, but harder. : : What's required for socks support? In looking at the problem a little, I'd have to hack both client and server side to deal with a tcp sendmsg. That seemed to be too hard :-(. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message