From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 5 8:38:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from postoffice.aeonflux.net (postoffice.aeonflux.net [208.139.254.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF45114BE7 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 08:38:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hg@ParView.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by postoffice.aeonflux.net (8.8.8/8.8.7/PCS9711a) with UUCP id LAA25363 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 11:36:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from hg@localhost) by ParView.com (8.9.2/8.8.8/n2wx) id LAA30797; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 11:36:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from hg) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14088.55409.119250.13039@slice.parview.com> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 11:36:17 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: hgoldste@mpcs.com Reply-To: hgoldste@bbs.mpcs.com Subject: MFS_ROOT vs. async mount X-Mailer: VM 6.56 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In a picobsd environment what's the preferred way to get MFS_ROOT mounted with -o sync? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message