Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:40:14 +0200 From: Alfatrion <alfatrion@cybertron.tmfweb.nl> To: "Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey)" <brentb@loa.com> Cc: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW or IPFILTER? Message-ID: <3BC700CE.8000201@cybertron.tmfweb.nl> References: <20011012154307.O52936-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <003601c15328$db264480$24b4a8c0@pretorian>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey) wrote: > I tried IPFILTER for awhile ...and it very easy to use...but ..in my opinion > it isnt as configurable as IPFW. > IPFW is a little more to setup ...but still pretty easy ...and the syntax > isnt that hard to understand. Its best feature is its VERY > configurable...and as long as you keep logging to a minimum ...it doesnt use > alot of resources. > Seems its memeory intensive than anything ...running a firewall that is > I find IPF more configurable as IPFW. I don't know how to do the folowing in IPFW: pass out quick on tun0 proto tcp from any to any keep state. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BC700CE.8000201>