From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 16 08:24:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9FC16A401 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:24:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it) Received: from insomma.datacode.it (ip-174-86.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.174.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D61E13C45A for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it) Received: from localhost (localhost.datacode.it [127.0.0.1]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with SMTP id 484112C92A for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:24:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from insomma.datacode.it (localhost.datacode.it [127.0.0.1]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3052C90A; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:24:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from intanto (unknown [192.168.1.18]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with SMTP id 105C72C906; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:24:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:24:35 +0200 From: Massimo Lusetti To: "Kip Macy" Message-Id: <20070416102435.1d359984.massimo@cedoc.mo.it> In-Reply-To: References: <20070411191450.GE815@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20070412210957.GA31864@heff.fud.org.nz> <20070413172307.53d95262.massimo@cedoc.mo.it> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Peter Jeremy , Ian FREISLICH , brooks@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new trunk(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:24:40 -0000 On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:37:38 -0700 "Kip Macy" wrote: > Am I correct in assuming that all the people who feel strongly that > the current name should be kept to avoid a query-replace in the > documentation are volunteering to clarify on Andrew's behalf any > future name related confusion ? Both way!? :) My feel wasn't a strong one, i just feel it more natural to keep the name of the original one as i don't see any name clashing or confusion with trunk, but maybe that's just me. Regards -- Massimo.run(); ...his disciples lead him in; he just does the rest. -- Tommy