From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Oct 24 17:38:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF21544F8D4 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CJSxc58B5z3bnx for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B051D44F8D2; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B019F44F850 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CJSxc4DwCz3brD for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74EBD1C494 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09OHcSsw005531 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:38:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09OHcSSj005530 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:38:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250534] net/grive2: Merge upstream changes to fix OAuth quota limitation Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:38:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: lwhsu@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: lwhsu@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:38:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250534 Li-Wen Hsu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |lwhsu@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from Li-Wen Hsu --- (In reply to Samuel Andersen from comment #3) Hi Samuel, Thanks for working on a patch. It generally looks excellent. There are some minor points: - Because DISTVERSION is increased, PORTREVISION doesn't need to be bumped,= and needs to be cleared. Just removing PORTREVISION line is fine. - You mentioned that the line number of OS.hh needs to be updated, but it doesn't include in the patch. And there are two additional things hope you can consider: - The local modification of OS.hh looks a good candidate to be upstreamed. = Do you want to create a PR for it? - As there is no maintainer of this port and you have good progress of it. = May I encourage you taking the maintainership of this port? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=