From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 1 18:39:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from assaris.sics.se (assaris.sics.se [193.10.66.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9B214C40; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 18:39:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from assar@sics.se) Received: (from assar@localhost) by assaris.sics.se (8.9.3/8.7.3) id DAA87904; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 03:36:31 +0200 (CEST) To: Mark Murray Cc: Andreas Klemm , current@FreeBSD.ORG, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, nectar@FreeBSD.ORG, markm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kerberos 5, how to build whole system including X11R6 with it ? References: <199908011955.VAA64225@gratis.grondar.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.68) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Assar Westerlund Date: 02 Aug 1999 03:36:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: Mark Murray's message of "Sun, 01 Aug 1999 21:55:56 +0200" Message-ID: <5lg1237yld.fsf@assaris.sics.se> Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark Murray writes: > far as I know, X11R6.n K5 is broken, as it is based on a very > early beta of MIT K5. To many knowledge, the code that's in X11R6 is still based on a really old beta of MIT k5 and it would take some work to get it to work with some modern code. And besides, the protocol doesn't do what you want (IMNSHO), because it only authenticates the initial connection and doesn't do anything to authenticate or protect the X session after that. If somebody is working on adding some better mechanism of using K5 in X11 I would be interested. /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message