From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Feb 17 22:05:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA27739 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 22:05:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca34-51.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA27718 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 22:05:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id WAA09183; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 22:03:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 22:03:22 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802180603.WAA09183@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: matt@zigg.com CC: ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Matt Behrens on Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:22:09 -0500 (EST)) Subject: Re: Jordan's challenge (imap-uw) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * what was breaking the current port. I won't comment about software * maintainers changing file structures so radically and not even changing * the tarball name except to say "Yeesh". That has always been a problem with this port. If someone can take care of housing a "known good" tarball (like Imagemagick and lynx), it will be much easier for people to use. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message