From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 22 08:36:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C6816A4CE for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:36:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub2.midco.net (mailhub2.midco.net [24.220.0.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BB443D53 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:36:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pmes@bis.midco.net) Received: (qmail 14254 invoked by uid 0); 22 Dec 2003 16:36:51 -0000 Received: from host-195-219-220-24.midco.net (HELO bis.midco.net) ([24.220.219.195]) (envelope-sender ) by lvs-pop.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Dec 2003 16:36:51 -0000 Message-ID: <3FE71DA3.6020607@bis.midco.net> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 10:36:51 -0600 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031215 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Capturing Console Output X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:36:53 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to capture console output on one machine by hooking it to another with a null-modem cable. The machines are both running the same version of 5.2-CURRENT. What's the simplest way to get this to work? I've tried a number of different ways, but kgdb always says: (kgdb) target remote /dev/cuaa0 Remote debugging using /dev/cuaa0 Ignoring packet eror, continuing... Ignoring packet eror, continuing... Ignoring packet eror, continuing... Couldn't establish connection to remote target Malformed response to offset query, timeout Is there an easy test I can do when both machines are up to see if the connection is good? Would this be easier over the ethernet? Thanks, Pete...