From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jul 13 16: 9:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15EC37B8D1; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:09:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA416722; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:09:45 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:10:46 -0400 To: Kris Kennaway From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Displacement of Blame[tm] Cc: Justin Wolf , security@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 2:48 PM -0700 7/13/00, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > (also note that I do think that the recent addition of the > > word "Ports" to the subject line may be enough to address > > these concerns) > >I think it's amusing that these concerns only came up *after* I >made the change to try and address the very issue they now raise. Well, actually, I remember being concerned about this back when the we decided to be more serious about security advisories. I tried to say something at the time, but I think people were so tired of the debate of WHETHER to do advisories that I don't think anyone wanted another debate of what exact format the subjects should be in. --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message