From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Nov 21 18:27:20 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA06819 for smp-outgoing; Thu, 21 Nov 1996 18:27:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (root@spinner.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA06800 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 1996 18:26:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (peter@localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA25749; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 10:26:21 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: <199611220226.KAA25749@spinner.DIALix.COM> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Chris Csanady cc: Steve Passe , freebsd-smp@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP -current merge In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 21 Nov 1996 19:33:42 CST." <199611220133.TAA06109@friley216.res.iastate.edu> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 10:26:20 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-smp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Chris Csanady wrote: > > Just a thought, but what about the i586 optimized stuff? It is now default, > and I believe its all included even in the SMP case. How about trying the > old npx stuff? > > --Chris Csanady I changed all the "#ifdef I586_CPU" conditionals for the p5-only optimisations to "#if defined(I586_CPU) && !defined(SMP)" so that the p5 uses the generic bcopy/bzero/copyin/copyout like the rest of the cpu's. Cheers, -Peter