From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 18 07:57:37 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCDA1065673
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:57:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from legolas@legolasweb.nl)
Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net
	[212.54.42.165])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9243E8FC08
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:57:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [212.54.42.138] (helo=smtp7.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net)
	by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <legolas@legolasweb.nl>) id 1TDsI7-00057Z-RH
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:32:19 +0200
Received: from 5357e32a.cm-6-8d.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.227.42]
	helo=homey.local)
	by smtp7.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <legolas@legolasweb.nl>) id 1TDsI7-0006l1-Hy
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:32:19 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:33:21 +0200
From: Stas Verberkt <legolas@legolasweb.nl>
To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172102400.26215@wonkity.com>
References: <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local>
	<20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172102400.26215@wonkity.com>
Message-ID: <75ca1e92e2a51857615e193434898bf5@homey.local>
X-Sender: legolas@legolasweb.nl
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1
X-Ziggo-spambar: ----
X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.6
X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3,
	RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.2, TW_SV=0.077
X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Flag: No
Subject: Re: What replaces csup?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:57:38 -0000

Warren Block schreef op :
> The difference is that a local svn checkout has all the commit
> history. A comparison recently showed 700-some megabytes more space
> used by the svn checkout.
>
Although I believe the checkouts are bigger, I do not think they have
all the commit history. This is where SVN and CVS differ from systems
like Git or Mercury, which have all the history in a local working
copy. I think the overhead of SVN consists of backups and cached
copies of the previous revision, but I am not quite sure.