From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Aug 31 08:14:39 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA17890 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 08:14:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from login.bigblue.no (root@login.bigblue.no [194.19.68.12]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA17884 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 08:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eagle.bigblue.no (froden@eagle.bigblue.no [194.19.68.13]) by login.bigblue.no (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA04262; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 17:11:36 +0200 Message-Id: <199608311511.RAA04262@login.bigblue.no> From: "Frode Nordahl" To: "Ernie Elu" Cc: "isp@FreeBSD.org" Date: Sat, 31 Aug 96 17:13:57 +0100 Reply-To: "Frode Nordahl" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Frode Nordahl's Registered PMMail 1.52 For OS/2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Shell? Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 1 Sep 1996 00:58:10 +1000 (EST), Ernie Elu wrote: >> Anyone know of a shell that supports filename completing (Like TCSH) that is SMALLER, (like csh or sh). tcsh >> eats up 1 MB of ram, so it's a bit "expensive" shell to use as default shell, but we need filename completion >> when preessing ... >> >> Anyone? >> --------------------------------- >> Frode Nordahl >> >> > >I just use bash, seems to be robust. A bit less than 700kb per session. Yeah, but that still is more than 256K :) --------------------------------- Frode Nordahl