From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 4 02:37:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA09053 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 02:37:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from abc.xyz.net (froggy.anchorage.ptialaska.net [208.151.119.238]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA09048 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 02:37:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from groggy@iname.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abc.xyz.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA01321; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 01:37:35 -0800 (AKDT) (envelope-from groggy@iname.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 01:37:35 -0800 (AKDT) From: Steve Howe X-Sender: abc@abc.xyz.net To: Steve Friedrich cc: "groggy@iname.com" , Michael Suster , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: dual processor support In-Reply-To: <199810031751.NAA03670@laker.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >> Does FreeBSD support dual processors for x86 systems? > > > >i believe 3.0 will include support > >for SMP ... > > Please, if you don't know the answer for sure, then please, please, > please don't waste Internet bandwidth with your response. > > A better answer would have been to visit the web site and find the URL > and send it.... > See http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html after reading the web page above, i do not see what your point is ... directly from your reference: The FreeBSD Symmetric MultiProcessor kernel is now a stardard part of 3.0-current. For the latest kernel config options refer to src/sys/i386/conf/LINT. There is a ready-made file for creating a generic SMP kernel: src/sys/i386/conf/SMP-GENERIC. why waste available bandwidth on such pettiness? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message