From owner-freebsd-security Fri Oct 5 0: 7:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E900837B407 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 00:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 15pP5D-000JON-00; Fri, 05 Oct 2001 09:07:43 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Mike Tancsa Cc: Sean Lutner , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HA/Failover options In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 04 Oct 2001 22:12:10 -0400." <5.1.0.14.0.20011004220840.04858b48@192.168.0.12> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 09:07:43 +0200 Message-ID: <74546.1002265663@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 04 Oct 2001 22:12:10 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > What do you have behind the firewall ? Are all the boxes capable of any > sort of dynamic routing ? Using OSPF for example, you could have your 2 > boxes advertising the default gateway, one with a more attractive cost that > the other. Even Win2K has OSPF capabilities. It might be an easier way to go. Where can I read more about this with respect to the "client" (sheltered hosts) and "server" (firewall hosts) configuration of such a network? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message