From owner-cvs-all Mon Mar 27 1:10:21 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from piranha.amis.net (piranha.amis.net [212.18.32.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC7837BBD6; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 01:10:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blaz@amis.net) Received: from titanic.medinet.si (titanic.medinet.si [212.18.32.66]) by piranha.amis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764365D05; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:10:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:10:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Blaz Zupan X-Sender: blaz@titanic.medinet.si To: Dima Ruban Cc: Brian Fundakowski Feldman , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/linprocfs linprocfs_misc.c In-Reply-To: <200003270851.AAA93733@sivka.rdy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Nobody's actually saying "nuke it and bury it". The suggestion was to move to > ports collection. And I agree with it. > > I'm not sure how easy it would be (probably not very, because it depends > > on FreeBSD sources?) to put it in ports together with the Linux emulation > > libraries. After all, its of no use if you don't have the Linux emulation > > running. > > Well, generally speaking, everything in ports depends on FreeBSD sources to > the certain extent. Not true. I can have an empty /usr/src and compile most of the ports. I'm not sure if linprocfs will be the same, I admit I haven't looked at the source close enough to see if it would compile "stand alone". Blaz Zupan, blaz@amis.net, http://home.amis.net/blaz/ Medinet d.o.o., Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message