From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 06:25:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF4E16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:25:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F6343D1F for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:25:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004031114251701400khee9e>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:25:21 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1C624E; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:25:17 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Robert Fitzpatrick References: <1078934067.3686.44.camel@columbus> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 11 Mar 2004 09:25:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1078934067.3686.44.camel@columbus> Message-ID: <44wu5rmpf7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: kernel arp errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:25:23 -0000 Robert Fitzpatrick writes: > I am running 5.2.1 with two NIC's, both connected to a Cisco switch with > a Cisco router also connected to the switch for Internet connectivity. > There are 5 eth ports on the router, one of them with an address > assigned of 66.129.101.193/28 and another with 66.129.101.217/29, the > other eth ports are the ISP connection and other one other subnet. One > port not used. On the FreeBSD host, the two NIC's are assigned with em0 > as 66.129.101.198/28 and em1 as 66.129.101.219/29. These are the > messages I am getting over and over, note the IP's are those of the > router: > > Mar 10 10:35:49 esmtp kernel: arp: 66.129.101.193 is on em0 but got > reply from 00:30:94:32:94:30 on em1 > Mar 10 10:35:51 esmtp kernel: arp: 66.129.101.217 is on em1 but got reply from 00:30:94:32:94:32 on em0 It sounds like those NICs are hooked up to the same wire, which doesn't make sense...