From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 19 10:25:37 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA26804 for current-outgoing; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 10:25:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA26799 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 10:25:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA15358; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:25:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:25:21 -0500 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" Message-Id: <9512191825.AA15358@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: Nate Williams Cc: current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: pcnfsd.. In-Reply-To: <199512191745.KAA26843@rocky.sri.MT.net> References: <199512191548.IAA26516@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199512191743.SAA19778@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> <199512191745.KAA26843@rocky.sri.MT.net> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk < said: > I didn't say it was useless. I said it wasn't useful for the generic > user. And, with it so easy to get as a port I don't see why it should > become part of the system. I suspect 'fvwm' is more useful to the > generic user, but it's not part of the base sources. :) `fvwm' and `pcnfsd' are equally useless to me, and probably to anybody who runs FreeBSD in a `service-providing' mode as opposed to a `workstation' mode. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant