From owner-freebsd-bugbusters Mon Mar 18 16:36:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858BF37B405 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:36:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id F176C5346; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 01:36:10 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PR state revision References: <20020318162901.C27352@iguana.icir.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 19 Mar 2002 01:36:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20020318162901.C27352@iguana.icir.org> Message-ID: Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Luigi Rizzo writes: > the "suspended" by itself makes little sense, given that > nobody will deliberately put a PR in suspended state: > if anything, they will be moved to "closed" state. No; "suspended" is useful, and has been used for its intended purpose several times in the past. > I'd rather suggest to just put some code in the generation of > the list of PR's that flags entries whose status has not been > updated for a long time as "stalled" (and maybe showing > them in a different color on the web interface) so people > can be hinted on which entry to close. We do that already. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugbusters" in the body of the message