From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 14:42:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E840A16A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:42:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A074943D48 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:42:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD) id 1BdVQJ-0007Sx-3l for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:42:05 +0200 Received: from eirik.unicore.no ([213.225.74.166] helo=anduin.net) by anduin.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD) id 1BdVQ8-0007Sn-AY; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:41:44 +0200 Message-ID: <40DAE7EB.7070800@anduin.net> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:40:43 +0200 From: Eirik Oeverby User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040308) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Willem Jan Withagen References: <023d01c45161$8f486360$471b3dd4@dual><40CCA3CB.6090808@anduin.net><02b001c4517d$46da25c0$471b3dd4@dual><033301c45198$ddd10b40$471b3dd4@dual> <058901c4525a$105cfbc0$471b3dd4@dual> <010e01c45304$ed1c5c90$471b3dd4@dual> In-Reply-To: <010e01c45304$ed1c5c90$471b3dd4@dual> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on anduin.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anybody using net-snmp on AMD64 or other 64bit platforms?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:42:25 -0000 Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > For those really desperate to run snmpd on 64bit, there are some very crude > patches. Most likely not for the faint of hart, but everything compiles and runs > at my end. I can confirm that for the limited use I have of it, it seems to work. Been running for a week now, no hickups. /Eirik > They need more work to be integrated into the port, since I have not worked out > the int <> long <> pointer stuff. Which really creates issues here. > > None the less, if you want: > withagen.dyndns.org:/FreeBSD/net-snmp.64bit.diff > Tell me if it breaks. > > --WjW > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Willem Jan Withagen" > To: "Willem Jan Withagen" > Cc: ; > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:53 PM > Subject: Re: anybody using net-snmp on AMD64 or other 64bit platforms?? > > > >>>I've got it more or less running, and snmpd is no longer crashing on me > > "yet". > >>>But I'm now getting wrong answers for the tcp/udp connections. But for >>>established connections as well as open server ports.... >>> >>>Both netstat and snmpd do this by retreiving data with sysctl from the > > kernel. > >>>And where netstat has got its things right, snmpd seems to be really off. >>>The most likely reason is that snmpd defines some structures by itself, but >> >>now >> >>>the question is which part is that??? >> >>It is now running to the part where I can do the things with it I'd like to > > use > >>it for.... >>Just figure out a way of putting the changes back in in such a way that it'll >>still work on 32bit. And get the maintainer to accept my fixes... >> >>But as far as I could tell, certain features (udp/tcptables) did not work on >>i386 either. >> >>--WjW >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >