From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 28 0:26:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from warez.scriptkiddie.org (uswest-dsl-142-38.cortland.com [209.162.142.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D938237B404; Tue, 28 May 2002 00:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.69.11] (unknown [192.168.69.11]) by warez.scriptkiddie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036AB62D1A; Tue, 28 May 2002 00:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 00:30:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Lamont Granquist To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Cc: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group , Kirk Strauser , Subject: Re: Hardware RAID vs vinum In-Reply-To: <20020528095948.D16567@wantadilla.lemis.com> Message-ID: <20020528002940.G449-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 28 May 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 27 May 2002 at 6:02:23 -0700, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group wrote: > > > > It turned out that moving the application to hardware RAID improved > > performance by 40 times. > > This can only happen if there's something very wrong with the software > RAID-5, either the implementation or the configuration. My first thought was cache on the hardware RAID array. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message