From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 22 15:48:42 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id PAA10233 for current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 15:48:42 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA10226 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 15:48:39 -0800 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id PAA06084; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 15:47:50 -0800 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199502222347.PAA06084@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: TRUE and FALSE To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 15:47:50 -0800 (PST) Cc: wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu, current@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199502222345.QAA15987@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Feb 22, 95 04:45:52 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 619 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > At what gain are we doing this? I believe it's a noble gain to have the > source tree compile w/out reference to /usr/include, but what does it > gain us? The only thing I can see where it's a big deal is building a > brand-new $(DESTDIR) tree. Other than that, most of the time I *want* > to use the files in /usr/include and NOT those in /usr/src (speaking as > a user-land kind of guy). "The only thing..." You are elected to release eng for 2.2 if you want to ... :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp TRW Financial Systems, Inc. I am Pentium Of Borg. Division is Futile. You WILL be approximated.