From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 7 20:29:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6DC16A4DA; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFA843D45; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:29:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k87KTkm0019507 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:29:46 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k87KTk1L019506; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:29:46 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:29:45 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20060907202945.GE40020@FreeBSD.org> References: <200609061356.k86DuZ0w016069@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060906091204.B6691@odysseus.silby.com> <20060906143204.GQ40020@FreeBSD.org> <20060906093553.L6691@odysseus.silby.com> <20060906150129.GT40020@FreeBSD.org> <20060907000939.J12826@odysseus.silby.com> <450067BB.3080501@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <450067BB.3080501@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Mike Silbersack , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in_pcb.c tcp_subr.c tcp_timer.c tcp_var.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 20:29:59 -0000 On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:40:59AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: J> If we are seeing less than stellar TCP performance on a loaded 6.1 machine J> will this change possibly fix it (was faster under 4.8).? J> J> when will the MFC occur? If you mean that bulk session is slower, than this is not the case. If you mean that the box behaves laggy under high TCP load (a lot of sessions), than this is probably the case. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE