From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 23 17:12:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E4916A41F for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:12:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from opusnet.com (mail.opusnet.com [209.210.200.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876ED43D45 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:12:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain [70.98.247.55] by opusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AA91266B014A; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 10:12:49 -0700 Received: from localhost.localhost (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6NHDlAu022263; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 10:13:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localhost (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j6NHDccD022260; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garys@opusnet.com) To: Matt Juszczak References: <20050723122759.N91546@neptune.atopia.net> From: garys@opusnet.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 10:13:38 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050723122759.N91546@neptune.atopia.net> (Matt Juszczak's message of "Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:29:20 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Completely removing a port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:12:56 -0000 Matt Juszczak writes: > Is there anyway I can deinstall the port and say "remove all > packages that depend on amavisd-new and amavisd-new ONLY" (so it > wont affect other stuff). I don't know, but I would try "pkg_deinstall -Rn" (which is non-destructive) and see if the output makes sense. But I'd think you'd really want "-Rrn".