From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jun 15 08:53:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA03370 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:53:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from server4.mpcbbs.com.br (server4.mpc.com.br [200.246.0.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA03271; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:53:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from capriotti@geocities.com) Received: from hot_nt (d1p14.mpcnet.com.br [200.246.29.78]) by server4.mpcbbs.com.br (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id MAA17417; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 12:52:53 -0300 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.32.19691231210000.0092cac0@pop.mpc.com.br> X-Sender: capriotti@pop.mpc.com.br X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 12:50:34 -0300 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Capriotti Subject: SKIP and IP encryptation Cc: capriotti@geocities.com, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello. I am sorry for the crossposting; I thought it could save some time and maximize the search capabilities. Is there any case of successfull implementation of IP encryptation provided by SKIP someone could tell me about ? And, of course, the other side: The vulnerable/not very favorable points of SKIP like performance, reliability, etc. TIA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message