From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org  Mon Jul 17 15:03:11 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DC8D9574A
 for <freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:03:11 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com)
Received: from mx.irealone.hr (xoth.irealone.hr [136.243.79.146])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF6C563E99
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com)
Received: by mx.irealone.hr (Postfix, from userid 58)
 id 2439576F4; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:03:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on
 postfix.xoth.irealone.hr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
Received: from mail.irealone.com (unknown [10.0.0.10])
 by mx.irealone.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9524376F0
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:03:05 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:03:05 +0200
From: "Vlad K." <vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1
Organization: Acheron Media
In-Reply-To: <20170717141115.GQ16843@FreeBSD.org>
References: <f16afd19d4e0be57dc5cef0b68a7edea@acheronmedia.com>
 <20170717133359.GP16843@FreeBSD.org>
 <61f79801976fab6770471cd3e2359652@acheronmedia.com>
 <20170717141115.GQ16843@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <54f7e918d4507b50e64ea766b2b04035@acheronmedia.com>
X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:03:11 -0000

On 2017-07-17 16:11, Glen Barber wrote:
> 
> kib gave feedback on this in an earlier reply (which I missed before
> replying myself).
> 

Neither of which answered my questions, I'm sorry. My question was not 
about stack sizes in 32 or 64 bit installations, nor about the quality 
of the fix (if I parse the rm libtrh comment correctly).

I simply asked if it's safe to assume the sysctl to be an integer in 
11.1 (I'm guessing yes looking at the commits to STABLE, but wanted to 
be sure), and I also asked why wasn't the bsdinstall-er option change 
MFC'd after 1 day, two weeks ago, whether it's by omission, simply 
ENOTIME, or something else...


-- 
Vlad K.