From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Jan 5 14:13:50 2001 From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 5 14:13:47 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C26A37B402 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk ([192.168.91.36] ident=root) by scientia.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 14Ef7J-0004He-00; Fri, 05 Jan 2001 22:13:45 +0000 Received: (from ben@localhost) by strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f05MDie14006; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 22:13:44 GMT (envelope-from ben) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 22:13:44 +0000 From: Ben Smithurst To: Will Andrews Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sigmask(2) MLINK? against sigsetmask(2)/sigblock(2) manpages... Message-ID: <20010105221344.R85794@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <20010104115943.F86630@argon.firepipe.net> <20010104174731.J85794@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <20010104132137.H86630@argon.firepipe.net> <20010105210618.P85794@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <20010105170640.B682@argon.firepipe.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010105170640.B682@argon.firepipe.net> Sender: ben@scientia.demon.co.uk Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Will Andrews wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 09:06:18PM +0000, Ben Smithurst wrote: >> Thinking about it, the best solution might be to put sigblock, >> sigsetmask and sigmask all in one manpage with appropriate MLINKS. >> Something like this. > [...] > > Looks good to me. Since you're the doc committer here, you probably > should do this. ok, I'll see if anyone here has any objections first though. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message