From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 25 16:36:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD23516A412 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:36:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD8543D49 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:36:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GcljA-0001Vu-5M for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:35:40 +0200 Received: from 89-172-52-151.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.52.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:35:40 +0200 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-52-151.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:35:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:35:03 +0200 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <20061024152308.GG75746@garage.freebsd.pl> <200610242150.54923.antik@bsd.ee> <20061025143446.GE1167@garage.freebsd.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-52-151.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) In-Reply-To: <20061025143446.GE1167@garage.freebsd.pl> Sender: news Subject: Re: Updated gjournal patches [20061024]. X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:36:27 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:50:54PM +0300, Andrei Kolu wrote: >> Now I can mount it but only as journaled one.... Can I benefit from journaling >> with other filesystems other than UFS2 right now? > > No. Hmmm. Isn't it more of the case that you CAN benefit from journaling as long as the file system is simple enough (like msdosfs) or you're using it just for the performance and don't mind the fscks (like ext2)? I.e. it's still a generic journaling layer with UFS as a special marginal case, right?